Scientific Journal https://journal.scientic.id/index.php/sciena <p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>Scientific Journal(SCIENA)</strong></span> published by an official of Scientific.id_considers the following types of original contribution for peer review and publication: Research Articles, Review Articles, Letters to Editor, Brief Communications, Case Reports, Book Reviews, Technological Reports, and Opinion Articles. It Is published six times a year and serves the need of scientific and non-scientific personals involved/interested in Natural Science (Physics, Chemistry, Electronics, Mathematics, Astronomy, Oceanography, Engineering), Social Science, Economics, Biology and Medicine. Each issue covers topics, which are of broad readership interest to personals from General Public, Industry, Clinicians, Academia, and Government. Scientic Journal is a must read journal for every one with curiosity in science.</p> <p><span style="color: #3366ff;">Submissions</span> are welcome from other clinically relevant areas. However, the Journal emphasizes publishing high-quality and novel research.</p> <p><span lang="en"> </span></p> en-US scientific.journal@scientic.id (Sanubari Rela Tobat) scientific.journal@scientic.id (Team Support ) Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.8 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Opioid-Free Anesthesia: Current Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives https://journal.scientic.id/index.php/sciena/article/view/357 <p><strong>Background:</strong> Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA) has emerged as a revolutionary paradigm utilizing non-opioid multimodal analgesia to achieve stable nociceptive control without intraoperative opioids. This review evaluates the clinical evidence, practical applications, and implementation challenges of OFA. <strong>Methods:</strong> A comprehensive literature review was conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, selecting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the last five years. Data extracted included study designs, surgical typologies, pharmacological regimens, and clinical outcomes. <strong>Results:</strong> OFA provides non-inferior intraoperative stability and analgesia while significantly enhancing recovery scores, sleep quality, and PONV reduction. However, its efficacy is surgical-specific: it markedly reduces morphine needs in visceral procedures (bariatric/colorectal) but offers no advantage over optimized opioid-sparing anesthesia in musculoskeletal surgeries like total hip arthroplasty. Furthermore, high-dose non-opioid adjuncts introduce challenges like prolonged extubation, increased PACU stay, and sympathetic fluctuations. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> OFA is a safe and effective technique that minimizes opioid-related complications and improves recovery, particularly for high-risk patients and oncological surgeries. However, its benefits are surgical-specific and not universally superior to optimized Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia (OSA). Future universal adoption requires standardized dosing and objective monitoring (pEEG and Surgical Pleth Index) to ensure predictable recovery.</p> Rialta Hamda, Rahma Yulia Putri, Annisa Lidra Maribeth Copyright (c) 2026 Rialta Hamda, Rahma Yulia Putri, Annisa Lidra Maribeth https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 https://journal.scientic.id/index.php/sciena/article/view/357 Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000